Ninja 400 Riders Forum banner
21 - 40 of 423 Posts
See y'all in the morning at 6!!!
6am PT....

Here are my predictions for the US market. Hopefully Kawasaki doesn't punk us and not release the ZX4R today.

7500-8500 usd
399-410 lbs
72-77 hp

Edit: Nice bike but it is very close in weight and price to my current 2021 ZX6R KRT so I'm not seeing much benefit for me personally. The ZX6R with a slip-on is around 420 lbs and the 2021 ZX6R KRT ABS is 11.5k.

ZX-4RR

9699 USD
412 lbs
 
USA didn't get ZX-4R, only Canada? Both got ZX-4RR. Why is the R more expensive than RR in Canada. Edit: they fixed the pricing swap. RR has qs/ab and "zx10r rear style" suspension.

Bore/stroke (57.0x39.16 = 399.7) is NOT the same as Kove 400 (59.0x36.5 = 399.2) wow there are two of them now.

Anyone see power numbers? [edit: 76hp and +3 w/ram, 26.5 ft-lb tq @ 11000]
 
From Kawasaki.com:

Weight 414.5

Image




Stroke 39.1 mm suggests Redline around 15000 RPM:

Ninja 4RR RPM39.11000012000140001500015500160001650019000
Piston FPM1.67322827893346390441834323446246015299

For comparison, Ninja 400:
Stroke1000011000120001220012500128301300013250
Ninja 40051.8
Ninja 400 stroke in inches2.0393733993739407941474249436144194504

Image
 
But 42 pounds lighter than a CBR650R.

ZX-6R has 45.1mm stroke vs ZX-4R 39.1mm, hard to say about rev limit.

Kawasaki USA only posted a YT video for the jet skis. 🤪
 
Everything's lighter than a CBR lol This is only like 10 lbs lighter than the ZX6R which is not a bragging point. I wish they would at least tell us how much power it makes. But the price and weight makes it a big disappointment in my opinion. I do like that it has autoblip if I'm interpreting that correctly. The power modes and TC is all worthless for a bike that's most likely under 70 hp.
 
At around 315 pounds (after mods) on my Ninja 400, I am more inclined to look into power mods for my 400. I know there are N400s putting out over 65 hp (not cheap) but to me a hot rodded 315 pound 65 HP bike seems better than a 415 pound 70 or 75 HP bike.
 
So I imagine OTD price of 11k.... Seems steep. It is the Elusive Double R that Kawasaki does for special models though. Not sure if its worth the cost. 1K more for a ZX6R. I still wants for some reason....
 






 
Motorcycle.com said: "26.5 lb-ft of torque at 11,000 rpm. Our guess is peak power will be around 40-50 hp." Okay, 26.5 * 11000 / 5252 is 55.5 hp and that's unlikely the peak. It's going to make 60-something at the crank. CycleWorld article claims 16K red line.
 
Have they announced when they'll be available in dealerships? Can't find any info on that. Also I think it's weird they're starting with a RR version. Usually that's a special edition available only in some years. Maybe they'll release a regular ZX4R next year? If that's the case it's weird they're doing it backwards.
 
Holy ****! $9700??! That's way more than I expected. And about 50 lbs heavier than the ninja 400! Might have to pass on that now.
Same here. I also saw torque as 26@11k. Based on that and 14k redline I’m guessing somewhere not much higher than 60-62 hp max. At 415 lbs it may have a bit more top speed than the twin but I doubt the performance increase will justify nearly twice the cost for a track bike.

Cool bike but……. We’ll see :)
 
Everything's lighter than a CBR lol This is only like 10 lbs lighter than the ZX6R which is not a bragging point. I wish they would at least tell us how much power it makes. But the price and weight makes it a big disappointment in my opinion. I do like that it has autoblip if I'm interpreting that correctly. The power modes and TC is all worthless for a bike that's most likely under 70 hp.
I think it's a good price point. If it was much cheaper it wouldn't have good suspension components and all the other goodies. If they'd put crap suspension on it and charged $7995 I wouldn't be interested at all.
Agree on the weight, I was hoping for 20lbs lighter. But then would cost $2k more.
 
Just to compare a bit...

N400 claimed torque is 28 ft lb @ 8000 rpm with 11.5 compression ratio, which is 43 hp @ 8k rpm (out of 12k rpm redline)
ZX-4RR claimed torque from those articles is 26.5 ft lb @ 11k rpm with 12.3 or 12.6 compression ratio, which is 56 hp @ 11k rpm (out of 16k rpm redline)
ZX-6R claimed torque is 52 ft lb @ 11k rpm with 12.9 compression ratio, which is 114 hp @ 11k rpm (out of 16k rpm redline)

Peak hp is typically a bit higher than the hp at peak torque (shown above), as torque falls off slowly -- so typically peak hp is at a slightly higher rpm as well.

Maybe USA compression ratio will be bumped?
 
The UK article details a "ZX-4R SE" model with qs/ab, smoked screen, USB power, and sliders (but no fancy rear shock).

Kawasaki.co.uk lists 76 horsepower (and 79 w/ram air.)

This is also from the above site, BUT seems the same gear ratios at the Ninja 400 ... yeah not sure about that
Get out your GearingCommander:
1st 2.929 (41/14)
2nd 2.056 (37/18)
3rd 1.619 (34/21)
4th 1.333 (32/24)
5th 1.154 (30/26)
6th 1.037 (28/27)
Primary/Secondary Reduction 2.029 (69/34) / 3.429 (48/14)
 
With Kawasaki's $735 dest/freight, this is definitely pushing $12K otd in California. ZX-6R isn't $1K more, it's $2300 more with ABS.

Kawasaki.co.uk lists 76 horsepower (and 79 w/ram air.)
If that posted hp is for real I’m impressed but I have doubts. If it truly produces maximum 26lb torque at 11k revs and can hold that torque all the way to 14k revs it would only produce about 69 hp.

I went to the Kawi UK site to see if I could verify the torque spec I saw but don’t even see the bike listed. Where you were looking did they list torque?
 
21 - 40 of 423 Posts