Need to bear in mind chap that a lot of the top speed reports on here are from riders in North America with the 36kW engine....the ninja 400 will not do 120mph I dont care what you read on here it won't
My Akropovic did not give any more speed in fact Exhaust on 4 stroke bikes rarely give any more power ,@ KIWI. to even try to get that speed with our bikes you would screaming its balls off ,
what I can say is 2 stock 400 only posted speeds of of 101mph through timing lights
The retarding is in the fuel and ignition maps and you need to flash your ECU to get more power. You would get good gains with the Akrapovic if you tuned your fueling to suit that pipe.My Akropovic did not give any more speed in fact Exhaust on 4 stroke bikes rarely give any more power ,
but maybe ECU flash alters ignition timing so that would give you more power ,
I Would like to know just how the Power is retarded on our bikes ,we could possibly alter it
to same as yours.
My hand book says Power out put is 43.4@9.900 revs
36KW would be 48 hp
Yep, you just have to give it it's head! After a couple of track days where I thrashed it without mercy I'm not too concerned about the odd top speed run. There's guys racing these things, they will handle it.Quote: @ KIWI. to even try to get that speed with our bikes you would screaming its balls off...
As they shouldn't, as this is not something Kawasaki supports.Cant get my dealer to flash the ECU
Agreed. But what if the price on the Ninja 400 was $6600 and the 650 was $7700 - would you even consider the 400 at that point?The Ninja 400 for 5k is a awesome deal, while the Ninja 650 for 8k is a great deal and if that is the bike you truly want I have nothing against that, but..........
at that point your in the same ball park of two other bikes which I truly love the z900 which is just a few hundred more ($750.00) and zx6r (another 2k but now your getting a premier super sport).
rats, i am back to the whole Ninja 650 or ZX-6R or 400 thing again now :grin:. i LOVED ZX-6R but then it is way way way beyond me so buried the thought eventually (although the 2017 ZX-6R is on sale for 8,798 usd in MD,just saying).The 2019 Ninja 650 is growing on me. Especially the black with a hint of green color scheme.
A significant increase in hp and nearly double the torque the 400 has, wider front 120 and rear 160 tires for sportier appearance, and I personally love the location of the exhaust where it is almost level with the ground just so sexy.
I do like the looks of the Ninja 400 from the front a lot better as it has a much more sportier and aggressive stance and is 3k dollars cheaper.
That's where the problem starts in my opinion. The Ninja 400 for 5k is a awesome deal, while the Ninja 650 for 8k is a great deal and if that is the bike you truly want I have nothing against that, but..........
at that point your in the same ball park of two other bikes which I truly love the z900 which is just a few hundred more ($750.00) and zx6r (another 2k but now your getting a premier super sport).
I probably wouldn't buy one for this reason, but I would really love riding a 650 just to feel the difference from the 400.
I would go with the Ninja 650 or MT-07. I adore my 400, but had I had better credit I would have got a bigger bike. That being said, the 400 is stupid fun and stupid cheap to own, if you get a ninja 650 though make sure to get a 2018+, they shaved 42 pounds from it and redesigned it a bitHi guyz.. i use to ride ktmRc200 n now i wnt to upgrade to a bigger cc bike but confused between ninja 400 & ninja 650. There is not much difference between the price also so plz hlp me to decide... my preferences go with sports bike n nt mch intrstd in touring.i love doin cornering
If most of your riding is going to be commuting that consists of some highways, get the 650. While the 400 has enough power from standstill, it only has adequate passing power. I would gladly trade some top-end speed for more 60-80 passing power.rats, i am back to the whole Ninja 650 or ZX-6R or 400 thing again now :grin:. i LOVED ZX-6R but then it is way way way beyond me so buried the thought eventually (although the 2017 ZX-6R is on sale for 8,798 usd in MD,just saying).
i had zeroed in on the 650 and it was almost home but for the following:
1. 400 has a sportier feel to it. nimble, fast and begs to be ripped. 650 is fast too (the 30 added horses of course and 80% more torque almost) but more contained i feel. 400 is a lot easier to throw in corners as against 650 (but i am a noob at cornering so thats just me maybe).
2. price difference oh yeah. both being kawi do ensure reliability and i can rip my 400 without the fear associated with breakdowns (ducati/triumph if i may) and be content with it.
3. riding style -- city, touring (twisties specifically, mountains) and hence 400 was more suited for me.
4. the whole "It's more fun to ride a slow bike fast than a fast bike slow" thing. i can comfortably hold 75mph on a 400 with still some gas left in its tank. i wont go beyond it (race track someday perhaps) and hence it checks all the boxes.
the only thing about 650 was the highway stability. 400 does get me on the edge with those crosswinds but a corsa upgrade should do well and maybe i ll learnt o handle winds better.
justification for my purchase , yeah :devil: but some sound logic too i say.
to some extent i agree about getting a 650 if one is a commuter and tourer. it makes more sense yes. but 400 is not bad for the same intent too.If most of your riding is going to be commuting that consists of some highways, get the 650. While the 400 has enough power from standstill, it only has adequate passing power. I would gladly trade some top-end speed for more 60-80 passing power.
Also, you'll outgrow it fast. I've only been riding for 3 months and while Im still learning, I can tell I'll outgrow the 400 by the end of this riding season. Im already peeking at reviews of various middleweight naked and sport touring bikes.
Having said all that, I love my Ninja--its nimbleness, sports bike position, and its looks. After all, since its launch, its been regarded as the best sub-500cc street bike and by that definition, the best lightweight bike. So I'll probably end up having two different but complementary bikes in the garage.
So there's your solution![]()
Yea, I meant outgrowing the N400 from a power perspective, not anything else. First two months, as I was getting used to freeway speeds, I thought the power would be enough. The last month of riding, I realized it wasn't.to some extent i agree about getting a 650 if one is a commuter and tourer. it makes more sense yes. but 400 is not bad for the same intent too.
However, i dont understand the outgrowing it fast piece. 400 is a track focused bike and as such finds itself home when thrown into corners and accelerating out of it. for a beginner this skill takes time and i seriously doubt for such folks the outgrowing it fast would come that easy. the other aspect is braking. I have seen so many riders cornering with almost both cheeks out of the seat (inside) but then keeping the shoulder and head pointed outside to automatically compensate for the shift in CoG (which renders the whole butt out moot). And they still do not seem to realize this.
Heck, i have been riding (commuting) for 15 yrs on bikes that were good at acceleration and for city riding but never gave me confidence in corners or even with panic braking. So much so that i had 2 crashes (one while cornering, gravel to be blamed) and the other was a straight line target fixation and i couldnt brake (jittery nerves).
with the 400 the whole cornering on twisties is a different world altogether and i dont believe it is easy to outgrow it soon. the OEM stock tire is decent and i love cornering on it but then a better tire (think michelin road 4 or Pirelli Angel GT) would up the game even more and there would be more to learn on the very same bike.
But then i have barely ridden anything bigger then a ninja 650 (hayabusa once but was s**t scared). Maybe the seasoned riders can throw some light on this.
ride safe, have fun.
I went for the Ninja 400, i just found everytime i got off it i thought wow that was fun. Not that i didnt enjoy the 650 because i loved the extra power but it just didnt have that same wow factor for me in anything other than outright speed.@scox91
Im also in uk im wondering which bike you bought?
I have the 400 and do find its needs to be revved hard to keep its speed up ,its got plenty of speed for our motorways.
I would want a bigger bike on our motorways as you know no one sits on the limit ,
.the ninja 400 will not do 120mph I dont care what you read on here it won't
if you think it will come and sit next to my triumph ,
the advantages of the 400 are its light it handles really well
One big disadvantage , is that mine was very jerky on throttle so much that I didn't like going round islands so had a fuel module fitted .
lots of accessories for them, on mine I have tail tidy Akropovic exhaust, larger screen, a fuel module, seat cowl and no the exhaust won't make it faster its not a two stroke just sounds a lot better ,
Exactly! If you "outgrow" the N400...probably not going to be happy until everyone sees you on your new BMW HP4.“I have outgrown my bike”. “ I think I need a 1000.”
Since I might be the only person that made that sort of comment, I'll assume it's meThis is comment is not directed at anyone in particular. I have been hearing this statement for years, “I have outgrown my bike”. “ I think I need a 1000.” Pretty much everyone who said that has never done a track day. Do a track day on that bike you think you have outgrown. I bet you will feel different after. That being said we all have reasons for buying the bike that we have. AND they make different sizes of bikes so we have many choices. From 49cc to 2000cc. Not everyone wants to do track days or ride twisties or commute or stunt. Ideally I wish I could afford a garage full of bikes. At the moment I have the N400 and a gixxer 600.
That combo works for me...............for now lol.:grin: